hasemkey.blogg.se

1. PRIMOCACHE VS FANCYCACHE FULL
2. PRIMOCACHE VS FANCYCACHE SOFTWARE
3. PRIMOCACHE VS FANCYCACHE PC
4. PRIMOCACHE VS FANCYCACHE WINDOWS

This includes Amazon, GMG tap links, Star Citizen, etc.Īds include chat/game server recruitment (i.e. Rule #2: No affiliate, referral links, or ads

PRIMOCACHE VS FANCYCACHE FULL

Please see our full rules on piracy here. Please see our full rules on self-promotion here. Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy No calls for violence against any groups or individuals.Īny account less than 90 days old may be permanently banned on the first infraction of this rule. No racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic or other hateful language. This includes calling or implying another redditor is a shill. No personal attacks, witch-hunts, or inflammatory language. Do you want advice on building your own PC? Check out /r/buildapc | Looking for tech support? Check out our stickied tech support thread Join /r/pcgaming on Discord If you would like to schedule an AMA with us, please send us a message in Modmail. If you are seeing a crash when enabling Invisible Memory support in PrimoCache, then either the motherboard chipset is not supported or there is a conflict with the ramdisk software.Want to check out our previous AMAs? Click here. Having L2 on a ramdisk would mean cached data being stored 3 times in memory (once in Windows' file cache, once in Primo L1 and once on ramdisk as L2) so would be a waste of memory and CPU time. L2 is more for using an SSD to speed up an HDD.

PRIMOCACHE VS FANCYCACHE WINDOWS

It works perfectly OK with a cache file, it's just that there is *no point whatsoever* in placing that cache file on a ramdisk - the L1 cache (which can use "invisible memory" above the 3.25GB limit for 32-bit Windows systems) uses RAM so just stick with that. So yes, Fancycache is way more flexible - even if it may be some percent slower. because, you simply dont need to alter/resize the Ramdrive if you want to create -or- delete the (fancy)cache. With Fancycache you dont have such Ramdrive hassle with resizing + any unecessary back up steps, (* you need to back up yours data first to HDD and doing so still costs unnecessary time) Ok, now you want to cut H.264 stuff and back to a 8GB Ramdrive = in such case you have reconfigure Primocache + to resize the Ramdrive.Ĭertainly if you resize the Ramdrive = all data in the Ramdrive will be lost (*) So for example you configure the Invisible memory: 6GB Ramdrive + 2GB Primocache I have not tried Primocache + Primodisk, but I am pretty sure this combination will not work "on-the-fly" - because there is no option in primocache to select a Ramdrive. With fancycache I can "on-the-fly" create + delete the cache file -> without (!) changing my Ramdrive size (!) Is there a way to buy the Fancycache Beta for a more fair fee - without - buying primocache? I am not sure if fancycache is at last worth 29Euro if it is still an outdated Beta that will never get any updates. So, I am at last a little bit surprised if you have to buy first primocache just for getting acess to fancycache.

PRIMOCACHE VS FANCYCACHE SOFTWARE

I know there is a switch "using IM/invisible memory" for XP or any other 32bit OS Users in yours primocache software - but this IM switch still crashes XP if you are using a Ramdisk. I need the Ramdrive for Browsercache, Swap, Photoshop and H.264 cuttings, de/muxing. Since a Ramdrive is just memory, so certainly there is no performance lost.

PRIMOCACHE VS FANCYCACHE PC

The PC itself has installed 12GB RAM, so the other (unused/not OS managed) 8GB are used as Ramdrive. So using some off this (4GB) memory for additional caching is just a bad idea, because doing so means still less (free) memory for programms in return. XP can still adress 4GB and thats not much.